The Uncertainty Principle and Quantum Tunneling

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle states that the position and momentum of a particle cannot both be known exactly at the same time: Δx Δp ≥ ħ ÷ 2, and similarly ΔE Δt ≥ ħ ÷ 2; quantum tunneling is the effect in which a particle has a nonzero probability of passing through a potential energy barrier that it classically does not have enough energy to cross. In brief: the uncertainty is not caused by clumsy measurements but by the wave nature of matter. It explains why electrons do not fall into the nucleus, the natural width of spectral lines, and zero-point energy. The tunneling probability falls exponentially with barrier width, T ≈ e−2κL, and explains alpha decay, nuclear fusion in the Sun, the scanning tunneling microscope and flash memory.

Quantum mechanics changes the picture of nature from definite trajectories to probabilities. This guide explains the uncertainty principle and its consequences, describes quantum tunneling with its applications, compares classical and quantum behavior in a table, works through numerical examples and corrects common mistakes.

What is the uncertainty principle?

In 1927, Werner Heisenberg showed that for any quantum system the product of the uncertainties in position (Δx) and momentum (Δp) in the same direction is bounded below: Δx Δp ≥ ħ ÷ 2, where ħ = h ÷ 2π = 1.055 × 10−34 J·s. There is a similar relation for energy and time: ΔE Δt ≥ ħ ÷ 2. The principle follows from the wave nature of matter: a wave with a well-defined wavelength (and therefore a precise momentum, p = h ÷ λ) is spread over a large region, and a narrow wave packet (a precise position) is built from many wavelengths (a range of momenta). It is analogous to the relation between the duration of a sound pulse and its frequency range (Δf Δt ≈ 1). It is a basic property of nature, not a limit set by the quality of the instruments.

What are its consequences?

For everyday objects the uncertainties are negligible: for a 1 g bead with Δx = 1 µm, the minimum Δv is about 5 × 10−26 m/s.

What is quantum tunneling?

In classical physics, a ball rolling toward a hill without enough kinetic energy turns back. A quantum particle is described by a wave function that does not drop abruptly to zero at the barrier: inside the barrier it decays exponentially, and if the barrier is thin enough, a part of the wave emerges on the other side. The probability of passing through a rectangular barrier of height U and width L, for a particle of energy E < U, is approximately

T ≈ e−2κL, with κ = √(2m(U − E)) ÷ ħ.

It decreases very quickly with the width of the barrier and with the mass of the particle, so tunneling matters only for light particles (electrons, protons) and nanometer-scale barriers. Applications and phenomena:

Tunneling probability of an electron falling exponentially with barrier width 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1 10−2 10−4 10−6 10−8 10−10 Barrier width L (nm) Transmission probability T 3.3 × 10−3 1.0 × 10−5 1.1 × 10−10
Tunneling probability T = e−2κL for the 5.0 eV electron and 10 eV barrier in the worked example (κ = 1.15 × 1010 m−1), on a logarithmic vertical axis. The exponential becomes a straight line: every extra 0.1 nm of barrier lowers the probability by a factor of about 10. This sensitivity is what lets a scanning tunneling microscope detect tiny changes in height.

Classical and quantum behavior compared

Classical and quantum descriptions
Feature Classical physics Quantum physics
Position and momentumBoth can be known exactlyΔx Δp ≥ ħ/2
Barrier with U > EParticle always reflectedProbability of tunneling e−2κL
Lowest energy of an oscillatorZero½hf (zero-point energy)
Prediction typeDeterministicProbabilistic

Worked example: uncertainty and tunneling probability

  1. Electron in an atom. Δx = 1.0 × 10−10 m: Δp ≥ ħ ÷ 2Δx = 1.055 × 10−34 ÷ (2 × 1.0 × 10−10) = 5.3 × 10−25 kg·m/s. The uncertainty in speed: Δv ≥ Δp ÷ m = 5.3 × 10−25 ÷ 9.11 × 10−31 = 5.8 × 105 m/s, a large fraction of the orbital speed (2.2 × 106 m/s).
  2. Baseball. For m = 0.145 kg located to Δx = 1 µm: Δv ≥ ħ ÷ (2mΔx) = 1.055 × 10−34 ÷ (2 × 0.145 × 10−6) = 3.6 × 10−28 m/s, unobservable.
  3. Energy-time. An excited atomic state with lifetime 1.0 × 10−8 s has ΔE ≥ ħ ÷ 2Δt = 1.055 × 10−34 ÷ (2 × 10−8) = 5.3 × 10−27 J = 3.3 × 10−8 eV. The photon emitted has a spread in energy of this order (natural line width), a tiny fraction of the photon energy of about 2 eV.
  4. Tunneling probability. An electron with E = 5.0 eV meets a barrier with U = 10 eV and width L = 0.50 nm. κ = √(2 × 9.11 × 10−31 × 5.0 × 1.602 × 10−19) ÷ 1.055 × 10−34 = 1.15 × 1010 m−1. 2κL = 2 × 1.15 × 1010 × 0.50 × 10−9 = 11.5. T = e−11.5 = 1.0 × 10−5.
  5. Sensitivity to width. For the same electron, a barrier width of L = 1.0 nm gives T = e−22.9 = 1.1 × 10−10, and L = 0.25 nm gives T = e−5.7 = 3.3 × 10−3. A change in the gap by 0.1 nm changes the tunneling current by a factor of about e2.3 ≈ 10, which is why the STM can resolve atomic heights.

How were these ideas developed?

Heisenberg published the uncertainty principle in 1927 and received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1932. Niels Bohr’s complementarity and the Copenhagen interpretation followed. Friedrich Hund first noted tunneling in 1927 in molecular systems; Gamow, Gurney and Condon explained alpha decay in 1928. Leo Esaki observed tunneling in semiconductor diodes in 1957 (Nobel Prize 1973). The STM of Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer (1981) gave images of atoms.

Which mistakes are common?

Mistake 1: Saying that measurement disturbs the particle and that is the uncertainty

The principle is more fundamental: a quantum state does not have well-defined values of both position and momentum.

Mistake 2: Thinking that the uncertainty principle matters for everyday objects

The effects scale with ħ, which is extremely small, so macroscopic objects are not affected in a measurable way.

Mistake 3: Believing that tunneling particles gain energy or go “faster than light”

The particle’s energy is unchanged. Only the probability of crossing is small but nonzero.

Mistake 4: Assuming that tunneling is common for large objects

The probability falls exponentially with mass and width, and is negligible for macroscopic objects.