Social Systems, Altruism, and Cooperative Behavior

Altruism in biology is behavior that reduces the reproductive success of the actor while increasing that of the recipient, and it can evolve through kin selection (helping relatives, who share genes) or reciprocal altruism (helping those who will return the help). In brief: Hamilton’s rule says that an altruistic act is favored by natural selection when r × B > C, where r is the relatedness between the actor and the recipient, B is the benefit to the recipient and C is the cost to the actor. Social systems range from loose groups to eusocial colonies of ants, bees and naked mole-rats, where most individuals do not reproduce.

Helping others seems to conflict with natural selection, because genes for self-sacrifice should disappear. This guide explains the types of animal societies, the benefits and costs of group living, kin selection and reciprocal altruism, eusociality and cooperative breeding, compares the explanations in a table, works through a Hamilton’s rule calculation and corrects common mistakes.

Why do animals live in groups?

Living in a group has benefits and costs, and group size evolves to balance them.

Societies differ in organization. Some are simple aggregations (a school of fish), some have dominance hierarchies (the “pecking order” in hens, in which a dominant bird has priority for food), and some have division of labor and cooperative care of young.

What is altruism?

In evolutionary terms, an act is altruistic if it lowers the fitness of the actor and raises the fitness of the recipient. Fitness here means reproductive success, not the intention. Examples:

Because natural selection acts on genes, the puzzle is how genes for helping can spread.

What is kin selection?

W. D. Hamilton showed in 1964 that a gene for altruism can spread if it helps relatives, who may carry copies of the same gene. An individual’s success in passing on genes has a direct part (through its own offspring) and an indirect part (through the offspring of relatives), and the total is called inclusive fitness.

Hamilton’s rule: r × B > C

J. B. S. Haldane is said to have joked that he would give his life for two brothers or eight cousins, which is the same calculation: 2 × 0.5 = 1 and 8 × 0.125 = 1.

What is reciprocal altruism?

Robert Trivers proposed in 1971 that unrelated individuals can help each other if the help is returned later. It requires repeated interactions, recognition of individuals, and a way of punishing cheats who accept help but do not return it. The cost of helping must be smaller than the later benefit. Vampire bats that share blood meals with those who have shared with them are an example, as are some primates that groom each other. In the game theory model of the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the strategy “tit for tat” (cooperate first, then copy the partner’s last move) was successful in Robert Axelrod’s tournaments in the 1980s.

Other explanations include group selection (selection among groups), which is controversial and generally considered weaker, and mutualism, where both partners gain at once, so there is no true altruism, such as in cooperative hunting.

What is eusociality and cooperative breeding?

Eusociality is the highest level of social organization. It has three features: cooperative care of young, overlapping generations in the colony, and a reproductive division of labor, with sterile or nearly sterile workers and fertile queens (and sometimes kings).

Explanations of cooperation compared

Evolutionary explanations of helping behavior
Explanation Who is helped? Condition Example
Kin selectionRelativesr × B > CHelper scrub-jays
Reciprocal altruismUnrelated individualsRepeated interaction, return of helpVampire bats
MutualismPartners that gain at the same timeImmediate benefit for bothCooperative hunting
Parental careOwn offspringDirect fitnessBird feeding chicks

Worked example: applying Hamilton’s rule

A young bird can either breed alone or stay and help its parents raise siblings. If it helps, the parents raise 3 extra chicks (benefit B = 3 offspring), and the helper gives up 1 chick of its own (cost C = 1 offspring). The extra chicks are the helper’s full siblings (r = 0.5).

  1. Write the rule: helping is favored if r × B > C.
  2. Substitute for full siblings: 0.5 × 3 = 1.5, and 1.5 > 1, so helping is favored.
  3. Check helping cousins instead: the same 3 extra chicks would be cousins (r = 0.125), so 0.125 × 3 = 0.375, and 0.375 < 1, so helping is not favored.
  4. Benefit needed for cousins: B > C ÷ r = 1 ÷ 0.125 = 8, so cousins would need to receive more than 8 extra offspring.

The calculation shows why helpers are usually found among close relatives. In practice, B and C are hard to measure, and the model is a simplification, but studies of birds such as the Seychelles warbler have found that helpers are mainly related to the breeders, and that helping increases the survival of young.

Hamilton rule comparison of benefit times relatedness with cost 1.5 1 0.375 1 r × B C r × B C Full siblings (r = 0.5) Cousins (r = 0.125) Helping favored Not favored
Hamilton’s rule with the numbers of the worked example (B = 3 extra chicks, C = 1). For full siblings r × B = 0.5 × 3 = 1.5, which is greater than the cost of 1, so helping is favored. For cousins r × B = 0.125 × 3 = 0.375, which is less than 1, so it is not.

How was social behavior explained?

Darwin was worried about sterile worker insects in On the Origin of Species, and suggested that selection could act on the family. Haldane’s remarks in the 1950s and Hamilton’s papers in 1964 gave the mathematical theory of kin selection. Trivers published on reciprocal altruism in 1971, and E. O. Wilson summarized the field in Sociobiology (1975). Axelrod and Hamilton published on the evolution of cooperation in 1981. The idea of kin selection and the role of haplodiploidy are still debated, and some biologists, including Wilson later in his career, argued for a larger role for group selection.

Which mistakes are common?

Mistake 1: Saying that animals act “for the good of the species”

Natural selection acts on individuals and genes. Helping behavior is explained by benefits to the genes of the helper through relatives or reciprocation.

Mistake 2: Thinking that the animal calculates relatedness

Rules such as “help individuals that smell like me” evolved by selection. Animals do not do the calculation.

Mistake 3: Confusing altruism in biology with human motives

Biological altruism is defined by the effect on fitness, not by intentions.

Mistake 4: Assuming that queens control workers

In many colonies, workers affect the queen’s behavior and conflict can occur over reproduction and the sex ratio.